#JHMChat Recap: EHR Documentation–What Makes a Good Note?

>
By Lanna Felde, MD, MPH |  March 9, 2022 | 

Could being on Twitter make you a better note-writer? We certainly think so! That was one of the many hot takes from February’s #JHMChat, with special guests Drs. Blair Golden, Robert Centor, and Andrew Olson. We explored the most fundamental question in the electronic health record (EHR): what makes a good note?

Early in the night, Drs. Dhruv Srinivasachar and Robert Centor enlightened us to the origins of the problem oriented medical record by invoking Dr. Larry Weed and his 1971 grand rounds.

A central issue with notes is that they serve many purposes. They document the patient’s hospital stay, serve as a tool to think through differentials, inform medical billing, and most importantly, communicate with the care team and with the patient.

As if our notes didn’t already fall short, their limitations were underscored when the 21st Century Cures Act made clinical notes more accessible to patients and families. Many hospitalists confirmed that this has changed their approach to notes.

Many bemoaned billing requirements that reward medical complexity, which often makes notes unreadable for patients and families. Billing requirements also contribute to burnout among physicians. Dr. Centor noted that the only way to address this will be to change our documentation requirements.

There appeared to be almost universal agreement on the disgust with “note bloat” — you know, when notes are filled every lab and radiology read from the hospitalization.

Yichi Zhang, a medical student at Tulane, shared that his notes help him to translate learned schemas into concrete clinical reasoning. But do we routinely teach students and residents how to use their notes in this way? Many participants, including Dr. Subha Airan-Javia from the University of Pennsylvania and Dr. Sherine Salib of Dell Medical School said that the medical education community needs to be more intentional about teaching clinical documentation to our learners.  

Many participants shared innovations to transform the note writing process. Dr. Vinny Arora of the University of Chicago reported that her institution created a discharge summary that can be shared among multiple people, so that daily notes aren’t seen as “must contain everything”. Dr. Subha Airan-Javia described her experience creating a collaborative wiki version of documentation that has been adopted at her institution.

In addition to these ideas, many participants offered other concrete tips to make your notes better:

  • Dr. Centor suggested putting the assessment and plan first.
  • Dr. Bijay Acharya emphasized deleting your differential as new data comes in and you are able to commit to a diagnosis. He also proposed changing the diagnosis from symptoms to specific disease code as more data returns.
  • Dr. Mark Shapiro offered advice specifically for writing discharge summaries. He pretends he is the person reading it and asks, “What do I want/need to see? What is not relevant/distracting? What would make me feel frustrated to not have included?”

So, can your notes do it all? This #JHMChat discussion proved that the EHR documentation is challenging even for the most seasoned clinicians. Despite this, the note-writing landscape is ripe for innovation!  If you missed out on this #JHMChat, don’t worry! The next chat is coming up on Monday March 21st at 9pm ET and will explore some of our most popular Things We Do For No Reason™. We’re talking fluid restriction in heart failure, holding metformin in the hospital, and using race in the HPI. Don’t miss it!

Share This Post

One Comment

  1. Mark Clemons March 9, 2022 at 1:22 pm - Reply

    EHR’s that I saw 8 years ago before I retired, were lists of everything. No narrative to allow you to put your thoughts together to allow the synthesis of a diagnosis. Cut and Past of a past note made the problem of understanding what was going on even worse. The important stuff was buried beneath the filler to get a higher billing code. The need to put in the filler came, not from the doctors’ needs, but from the insurance company or medicare. And on top of this, it took even longer to write it and review it. My own internist would go home, eat dinner, then log back in to finish his charts. I also know many older doctors who retired rather than deal with the EHR. The had money and took their knowledge to the local charity health care program where they had a person who dealt with the computer. Old fashioned pen and paper was so much easier.

Leave A Comment

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

About the Author: Lanna Felde, MD, MPH

Lanna Felde, MD, MPH, is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Hospital Medicine at UT Southwestern Medical Center. Dr. Felde earned her medical degree and a concurrent master’s degree in public health at UT Health Science Center at San Antonio. She completed her residency in internal medicine at UT Southwestern and joined their faculty in 2018. Dr. Felde is the Director of UTSW’s Hospital Medicine Elective for Internal Medicine Residents and Chair of the Communications Committee for the Division of Hospital Medicine. Her interests include hospital best practices, social determinants of health, and medical education utilizing digital media.

Categories

Related Posts

By Lanna Felde, MD, MPH
March 9, 2022 |  1
Could being on Twitter make you a better note-writer? We certainly think so! That was one of the many hot takes from February’s #JHMChat, with special guests Drs. Blair Golden, Robert Centor, and Andrew Olson. We explored the most fundamental question in the electronic health record (EHR): what makes a good note? Honest question, has […]
Go to Top