Although most current rapid assays for Cdiff toxin A and B tout very high sensitivity and specificity, the cautionary wisdom elucidated in this study (abstract) is to consider the positive predictive value (PPV) of the test, which depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population you are testing. The authors note that only about 10% of hospitalized patients with diarrhea will have Cdiff. If there are 500 stool samples submitted, even if the sensitivity and specificity of your Cdiff test is 95% and 97%, the PPV is only 78% (which means that 22% of +tests do not represent true Cdiff). The assays evaluated in this study had median sensitivites from 76-95% and specificities from 93-100%. You can determine the PPV of the cdiff test at your hospital by determining the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, and the # (and % of total) of positive tests . This will greatly help you interpret your cdiff tests!
Share This Post
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Categories
Related Posts
Do you have a stack of journals piling up on your desk, beside your bed or in your email inbox? In 1950, medical knowledge was estimated to double every 50 years, but now the doubling time is every few months. At this rate, it is impossible to keep up with the literature, but a group […]
This large systematic review found rectal NSAIDs significantly reduced the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared to pancreatic duct stents (abstract).
This large population-based cohort found the most common causes of drug induced liver injury to be augmentin and diclofenac, followed by herbal and nutritional supplements (abstract).
It is an amazing job summarizing a paper in just a few words. Congratulations.
For a test with sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 97%, the PPV is 78% for a pretest probability (“prevalence”) of 10% as you correctly stated. However, 5% +test would “not represent true CDiff” (not 22%), if by this you meant the proportion of false positives.