The New York Times recently covered a story in layman’s terms on the impact of ICD-10 to the medical community, which is slated to commence in October. As you are likely aware, the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 will transform the specificity of diagnosis codes from 14,000 to 68,000, and procedure codes from 3,000 to 87,000. Some unique codes have generated comical reactions, such as a code for injuries that occur within opera houses. The purpose of the specificity is to enhance the accuracy of billing, which we can all agree is a reasonable goal to try to achieve. What ICD-10 will likely mean for hospitalists is months of familiarizing yourself with the branching logic of the relevant billing codes, and plenty of interaction with clinical documentation specialists. Although it will take some getting used to, just like any other change, it will unlikely be as bad as the forecasters predict. (Link to Times story)
Share This Post
Categories
Related Posts
Never let a good salary signal go to waste. Here is a meta-assembly of hospitalist, as well as comparator specialties, of 2018-19 salary moves courtesy of Modern Healthcare. It is useful seeing the various estimates from the leading consultants, placement firms, and intelligentsia to get some bearings on the pay trends, Covid notwithstanding.
From the beginning, SHM has consciously and consistently taken a unique approach to its advocacy efforts with the federal government. The advocacy priorities of SHM most often concern issues that we feel have an impact on our patients and the broader delivery system, as opposed to a focus on issues that have direct financial benefit […]
As an aspiring physician, I like learning about how things work. Since medical students learn very little about the “business” of medicine in school, this led me to pioneer a project on missed billing by hospitalists at a medium-sized hospital in the northeastern US. Although hospitalists do a tremendous amount of work, they do not […]
Leave A Comment